Today was quite an interesting and thought provoking day, and I hope to encounter more days like this…days with activity. I had already been introduced to the key members of the Karachi chapter of the Party in Lahore but since my return we had not been able to have a meaningful reunion.

As some of you may know Tareek-i-insaaf today started their street campaign, encouraged by the public, against the undemocratic rule of Pakistan. The agenda is simple and clear….free and fair elections need to be held in Pakistan. The current government has no legitimate right to stay in power, it is a military dictatorship which is only stifling the common man and international interest of our nation. It needs to be replaced with a democratic voice. I don’t mean democracy like the Iraqi democracy. We mean elections…not selections.

That is the agenda, and the street campaign started out today in Sahiwal – a small city (or perhaps a town) in Punjab. The good news is that it was strongly opposed by the government, and banners and posters were torn down and party workers jailed. Good news?....yes…because it only goes to prove that freedom and dissent – however peaceful is not to be tolerated against the government….and that the government is concerned. A law or clause 144 was imposed on Sahiwal. What is clause 144? Basically it states that a public gathering of more than 5 people is illegal, and this clause can be imposed on an area for a given period, if the government so wishes. Unbelievable. Sounds like a police state to me. Anyway…..the fact that there was resistance by the government to quell the activites of the Party in a small town like Sahiwal I personally think should be taken as an encouraging sign.

So given this backdrop of activity, a press conference was held today in Karachi which I was also able to attend. The objective was to denounce the government action against the peaceful campaign in Sahiwal and to inform that such actions would not disrupt the agenda and time line for the continued campaign. Additionally it would be in the benefit of all, if the opposition parties also joined in this one point agenda, but in the absence of such a coalition Terek-e-insaaf would go it alone…the public sentiment demands it.

If the government felt the heat from such a small spark of public sentiment, it should be interesting to see what happens when the campaign is taken to larger cities. I have to say though, that this campaign and associated government obstacles were given due media coverage, without which a lot of these issues would not have come to the attention of many people. My only hope is that our media is not also manhandled into compliance, as is the case in the US. With an unbiased and fair media, and coverage….the field is somewhat leveled.

Anyway, that was the jist of the activities and the messages. Personally I do agree with this one point agenda approach. It is a pre-requisite to any further progress. In the absence of free and fair elections, we are all held at the mercy of the General and his foreign commanders. We must reclaim our country, and once we have the opportunity to do that can the discussion and discourse progress onto what each party will do with that opportunity….therefore it is in everyone’s interest to support this essential pre-requisite…all other points and differences till then are irrelevant.

After the press conference I went to the Karachi office of the party. Here I was able to meet even more people and newer faces, from a variety of backgrounds…again something that is appealing to me personally. Variety is the spice of life…as corny as that sounds…I personally do enjoy varied interactions. It was interesting to hear the opinions and thoughts of “hardened” party supporter and “workers”. Workers is a term I use loosely…we are all workers…workers for the party …but more accurately for the people….but there is a section of the party membership which is more directly involved in the day to day activities of organization and management….and has experience/scars of elections and the like….they are the ones I am categorizing as “workers”….I agree, a better term needs to be found.

The discussions seemed to primarily revolve around the activities in Sahiwal and also the Passing of the Women’s right bill and subsequent threats of resignation from Parlimement by some opposition ministers.

Regarding the women’s rights bill…like many of you I too am new to all of this, so let me explain what I understand so far. Hudood Ordinance was set up by General Zia under the guise of Islamic shariah. The Ordinance covered a number of points, including prohibition, theft and the like and their associated punishments. There was one aspect of the Ordinance related to zina (sex between two unmarried people), which also for some reason included rape. Therefore in order for a rape case to be proved the same burden of proof was required i.e. specified number of witnesses. Regardless, the case of rape is different (and should have been treated differently) …here when the victim would demand justice against her perpetrators, if no witnesses could be found…….the case of rape would be dropped and she would be charged with zina! (since she already admitted to the sexual “encounter”). Obviously this was totally wrong and had to be changed. I must point out that I do not disagree with the Islamic laws….what I do disagree with is their abuse, and this was a clear case of abuse or misuse. Obviously in almost all zina cases no witnesses can be provided, and in Islamic history any punishment related to zina that have been carried out have been as a result of willful confessions.

So….a revision of the clause was understandably proposed. There were some disagreements with respect to the phrasing of the new clause. As a result some members of parliament said that they would give their resignation if the new clause was passed and was proved to be against the Quran and Sunnah. Now so far so good…but what I do not understand is this…the clause has passed, and the threat of those resignations has not materialized…but the whole debate continues on if and when these resignations will occur. Not once have I seen any evaluation of the clause itself and if it is in fact against the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah…I mean if there is to be a debate, should that not be the first point…subsequent to which the issue of resignations becomes important? I would think so. The point being that so many debates are raging in the media today with respect to these resignations, but they seem to be totally based on emotions and pre-determined alliances….the debate on the clause itself is silent….i still do not know if it is against the Quran and sunnah…..

Why not resign over the issue of American occupation by proxy? ….now that is an issue that doesn’t even require debate!

Carrying on with my day….i had a number of discussions with the various people and was assigned the duty to organize the party for the Defence Area (where I live). A challenge that seems quite enticing. I agreed….like I said…whatever I can do… I managed to get a list of the key party members in my area and decided to call them when I got home.

The list was not long and I managed to get through to almost all of them, I have a couple of meetings set up for day after tomorrow. I was able to meet one key member of the party this evening. He was a gentleman who had previously ran in elections on behalf of the party from Defence, let’s call him Mr.exD(efense) - as I said in the beginning, I do not want to disclose any names – those who can/want….deduce what you like like. He was now not that involved due to his personal commitments, but still felt strongly about the party and their objectives. Meeting him was quite interesting. His conversation was full of realistic and practical advice and information and as a result could have been taken to be discouraging at times by someone with less optimism than me! Regardless, it was invaluable. I prefer to be uncomfortable in reality than blissful in delusion. It wasn’t all discouraging by any means anyway….but obviously there are obstacles to what needs to be done to change the state of affairs in Pakistan. We all know that, we cannot ignore that…only if we are fully aware of the rude reality can we deal with it. The support of Mr.exD was also open ended…he said he would help introduce me to his contact base in Defense and offered to help in anyway he could. I thanked him and hope to meet him later this week…….

You know what…. I still hear a lot of negative (albeit realistic) points of views generally, but it only makes this all the more exciting to be honest. I mean ….anti (current) establishmentarian ….shake the status quo….this sounds like fun!

It is interesting to note of politics of Pakistan, and probably the overriding factor in the Pakistani gene as a whole …emotions. That seems to be one aspect of our people that rules over all others, broadly speaking. Little or no thought into what they think and why is usually given. If you ask someone why they support a given party the answer is usually nothing to do with the policies or the aims of that party – most wouldn’t even know – but everything to do with the perceived leadership (or in some cases the leadership of their deceased founders!) or their traditional alliances with that party – even if that party for all intents and purposes is totally new. New Labour….we learnt that trick a long time ago!

Speak of the devil....Phony Tony arrived in Paksitan this evening...

The purpose of this blog is not to engage in yet more pseudo-literary diarrhea, and I realize this is a bit early in the game to start with a critique of what I have already written, but I thought it important to clarify some points that i raised in my inital entry titled "Rationalization" (probably best to read that entry first, although not essential) – sort of set the agenda and explain things in a bit more detail…..be warned, though, it is possible you have not read the last of my musings…..

I guess my previous entries; at least the first one gave a bit of an insight into the logical progression of events. I do realize that it may be a case of looking at things through “rose tinted glasses”. I understand that I have taken an optimistic stance on our potential and our people. This is not a deliberate attitude, but a genuine one, and the proof of the pudding is in the eating….am I wrong ?is my faith in our nation and people misplaced? Basically that is my working hypothesis…we have the potential to be a formidable nation… Ok…anyway, enough of the utopia. ..

I do realize that there are a lot of ground realities to be dealt with. I do not expect that people will easily accept change. It has been said – I will have to dig up the exact reference to allocate the kudos – that any change is vehemently resisted by the people who will loose as a result of change, but only mildly supported by those who will gain - Machiavelli I think….anyway I think the point, whomever made it, is a good one to keep in mind.

We have a system established since the inception of Pakistan and a mindset inherited probably from times of British Rule. The system favors the few and the mindset is one of apathy. Those who loose out to the current system are kept on such a fine line between subsistence and fear that nothing changes. Basically if the masses were dying of starvation and were even poorer than they are today – we would have a better chance of a revolutionary change – because these people would have no choice but to demand it – to survive. That fortunately (I guess) is not the case…most of the people in Pakistan are surviving – barely, but are surviving. Therefore they are faced with a choice…..try and get a better deal by challenging the system, and risk what little they have now, or just accept their fate. It is little surprise that most opt for the second option. Necessity dictates it. We must be under no illusion though….if the trends continue, we may have no choice but to deal with a justified revolt of the people or more accurately the poor….why not resolve the situation before necessity also dictates such action…..

Central to the issue for progress of Pakistan, apart from national sovereignty (obviously!) is that of social welfare. The state is obligated, under Islamic principles to provide food, shelter, clothing, health and education to its citizens….why is that ignored? That is a far more important Islamic issue for us to be addressing than any other I can think of…

The way to provide or serve the people is through institutions….basically to do anything you need money..its not that we are short of money…it is just in the wrong hands (our parallel economy far exceeds our white economy), and what is in the
”right” hands is mismanaged or misspent. This is not to say no one is spending money in the right manner…I am talking about the general state of affairs – no pun intended.

As such we need to be in a position to collect tax revenues…everyone should be paying taxes! Today in Pakistan the bulk of the tax revenues is from indirect taxation…(taxes on consumer products e.g. oil, sugar, etc). Indirect taxation is paid by all…at the same rate…regardless of income…so the poor assume a greater tax burden than the rich…insane! If direct taxation is a concern of yours, then you just aren’t earning enough to avoid it! Only the foolish pay.

So we all agree…without money we cannot do much. A government’s revenues come from taxes…as far as I am aware…so if we are not collecting taxes properly…why are we wondering why we are broke? What other revenue stream is going to cover the tax shortfall of so many people? Loans from the World Bank ,IMF, USA et al.? Interest rate – low….deal….p.s. your soul included.

The only way is by having proper institutions – especially the judiciary – which ensures that the law is applied equally and fairly to all! Tax laws which are based on strong principles of distribution of wealth…and appropriate application of tax policies for the benefit of the majority at the expense of the few – who can afford it. This needs to be coupled with proper compliance and procurement procedures and transparency to ensure funds collected are not funds that end up in Swiss accounts or multiple foreign properties. A minimum wage needs to be introduced – what do you think the waiter, thinks when he sees you and few of your friends blow his monthly salary on an average meal? Ok… let’s start with government institutions at least. I mean…try living on Rs.10,000 a month…try it with a couple of dependants…let’s see how far you get.

Only certainty….death and taxes….i wish!

What is happening in Pakistan today is probably unprecedented in recent history, except in the case of Iraq and Afghanistan, where puppet regimes rule over a sovereign people through force. Such is the case today in Pakistan, without the messy requirement of an invasion, we just surrendered and gave up our country without as much as a verbal protest.

The actions undertaken by the Army, under the direction of General Pervaiz Musharaf, or rather more accurately under Bush, against the people of Bajur under the false banner of terrorism is an human rights atrocity. The same kind of atrocity that Saddam Hussain has been given the death sentence for allegedly committing – he denies it, but Gereral Musharaf proudly brandishes his actions. The fact that military action was taken directly by the Americans, but the blame gladly assumed by our own General makes the state of affairs even sadder. Although I understand the rise of false flag operations in the political landscape of today, the usual approach to such an operation is that the party being blamed for conducting an action, which it hasn’t, does not then go into public and accept the false charge. This is especially so, when nothing is to be gained politically, economically or otherwise. In this case there is everything to lose, yet our General has no qualms about dancing to the American beat to the extent of total disregard for even basic logic.

What we are seeing in Pakistan today are the seeds of civil war – which needs to be contained. “Divide and conquer” The Army is turning against their own population e.g. Waziristan, under the guise of terrorism. I am still baffled how our “leaders” can be duped by an ideology and approach that has found defeat in it’s own nation of origin, as proved in the recent elections of the United States. The people of the United States have woken up, despite the biased media and constant saber rattling of “terrorism”. Having suffered 911, which still has too many unanswered questions to allow anyone to conclude with any certainty as to the perpetrators, the American people and politicians are becoming aware of the self-fulfilling strategy being applied globally in this “ongoing war on terrorism”. It is nothing more than a war for petrodollars and the security of Israel, it has nothing to do with WMD’s, or freedom, liberty or democracy. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional. Knowing that the whole campaign is based on ulterior motives, and that there is no such threat of terrorism, unless it is self-created, why is “our” commander in chief so eager to wage war on his own people? Perhaps a pat on the back from Bush is sufficient reward.

The actions at Bajur have resulted in a retaliatory action by the people against the Army – a first in Pakistan’s history. A suicide bomber entered the Army Barracks and blew himself up in a attempt to settle the score for the deaths of numerous civilians, many of whom were children. This prompted a prayer in the senate for those whose lives were lost in this attack – but any attempts to lead a similar prayer for the lives lost in Bajur was met with resistance in the form of microphones in the Senate being disabled. In essence any dissention against the General, even within the legal rights of the constitution are not to be tolerated. It may offend our American masters.

Any leader must realize that he is in power because of the people, rather than inspite of the people – as is the case in Pakistan. The public was going along with the government since its inception due to promises of free and fair elections, economic prosperity and a leadership driven by national interest and principled decision making. The promise of such things, with some superficial economic improvements (for the rich), maintained some sort of status quo. People are now waking up to the fact that the promises were a mirage used to delude us, and we are now being ruled by someone who’s only driving principle is American commandments.

Today Bajur, tomorrow somewhere closer. Would we have this same approach if this action had been carried out in our own neighborhoods or cities? There is nothing stopping these actions coming to our own doorsteps unless we take a strong stance against such actions against any of our countrymen. We should be under no illusions – we are today at the mercy of the Americans and should not require any further proof our occupation than what we have seen leading up to recent activities. The occupation may not be a physical one, but is an even more potent intellectual and political one. A people can only begin to fight for their freedom once they realize they are occupied. My only hope is that we all begin to awake to this fact and regain control of our own domestic affairs. Enlightened moderation…this action was neither enlightened, nor moderate.

I was fortunate enough to establish a direct contact with a key member of the party who gave me a patient hearing, and invited me to Lahore to visit the central office and meet some of the party members who were gathering for a meeting, prior to the start of the election process. I thought this would be a great opportunity to evaluate things first hand. I spent the first day with a couple of party members and was able to shadow them through the course of the day. I was encouraged by the positive reception they were given at many of the engagements, and a lot of the private sentiments of people were also revealing. People agreed with what they wanted to do, but again felt frustrated and helpless in that change occurring – a recurring sentiment. I also got to hear the party member’s internal concerns and obstacles they faced – despite which their commitment did not seem to waver. I suppose when you have a sincere belief that you are acting in a sincere manner you find the conviction to face the obstacles. The first day spent at party offices was an eye opener and rather encouraging. The following day the party meeting was held. Imran Khan chaired the meeting and key party representatives from all parts of the nation were present. A lot of interactive discussion was held and issues raised, resolved and identified. What seemed consistent throughout, in the meeting and in private discussions was optimism. Finally! These people, like me, also believed that things had to change, they could not continue as they were. That a great injustice was being inflicted on our nation and in particular the poor. They were sympathetic, most of all they were committed to doing something – whatever the outcome. This type of attitude was reflective of my own personal views. I felt comfortable – I was around people who also felt and thought what I did. I am sure there are specifics that people do differ on, but everyone was united on the agenda of positive social change, and our obligation to contribute especially to the “masses” – this was what was important. Additionally, the party members were educated, exposed and not by any means people who anyone could consider to be naïve. They understood that the challenges were significant – they were not delusional – the ground realities were understood and being dealt with. There were no airs and graces amongst the people, there was no strict protocol and stifling hierarchy, people expressed their views without fear of retribution. This type of open dialogue was refreshing.

I decided that this was a party I was comfortable with. The people were of a similar mind-set. The objectives were in line with my personal thinking. I could not think of any good reason, apart from apathy, not to join and start contributing. Tareek-i-insaaf was to be the party I would join and start on the road of politics. In terms of my involvement in politics, I am just talking about contribution. I do not expect to hold a key post, I do not expect to sit in an A/C’ed room and think about solutions and criticisms. I want to get my hands dirty and contribute to the overall aims and objectives. The objective is to serve the people, not the other way round.

On my flight back to Karachi, I thought about my experience and what had brought me to this decision. It was then that I decided that I should start a blog to document this experience. It would serve as a good means for me to examine my thought progress and also solicit feedback. This blog will not infringe on any confidentiality, nor reveal any private discussions or information entrusted with me. It will just be a account of my experiences and my thoughts, a means for me to evaluate the chosen course of action, and to serve as a means for enagaging those who may happen to stumble upon it. If you are one of them, then please let me know; What are your thoughts, comments, complaints, ideas, reservations, criticisms, observations, feedback, jokes!....anything…I would like to get a feel of things, are others thinking what I am thinking? What do you suggest? Criticize, complain, educate, entertain, whatever….don’t just sit there……

I have thought about writing a blog on many occasions, but it always seems either too personal or too boring, but something happened recently or rather a chain of events which I thought would merit a blog.

Let’s start with a bit of background. I am a Pakistani male in my thirties – born in Pakistan, but never really lived here. My parents moved to the middle east when I was one, and spent most of my formative years there. Our family used to travel to Paksitan regularly, usually a couple of times a year. With the completion of my O-levels and the lack of further education in the middle east took me to London. My A level and bachelors were done from there, and then I moved to the US to work for an accounting firm before returning to London to complete my Masters, after which I embarked on setting up a business with some friends based in the UK and Pakistan. I continued to live in the UK but traveled frequently to Pakistan, due to business commitments. About 8 months ago I decided to move back to Pakistan permanently for a number of reasons, the details of which I may get into later.

Despite being an overseas Pakistani I always felt a strong bond to my roots, I often feel that this bond is possibly stronger in some overseas Pakistanis because they are constantly defending their identity and tarnished (often deservedly so) image. I think this is also compounded by the fact that overseas you see the achievements of other nations and their infrastructures and institutions and in contrast Pakistan with its vibrant people, natural resources and significant potential seems to lag behind and unable to emulate strategies that work. I have always had an interest in why things are the way they are, both on a national and more recently on an international basis, and what can be done to change things for the better. No doubt this is something a lot of people also think about. What I felt strongly about though was that whatever the obstacles and hurdles and despite the level of actual change one can bring about – it is essential to do something….to make an effort, even if that effort turns out to be in vain. Often at social gatherings and casual banter with friends these topics are the central point of discussion – our situation as a nation, our situation as a people, the Muslims, global politics and the like…we seem very well equipped for arm-chair criticism, but that is as far as it goes – the passion and desire comes to an abrupt halt as the people disperse back to their daily engagements. Personally I feel that if one is to have the right to partake in any type of arm chair criticism of the general state of things – with that goes an imperative obligation to make an effort. Talk is cheap. Anyway, this thinking brought me to a decision that if I could, I must try and do something – in whatever capacity possible, firstly to understand the situation and then to see how it can be improved. This objective brought me to re-locate to Pakistan, as my business commitments give me this type of location independence.

Upon coming to Pakistan, and spending only about a year here so far, I have only begun to scratch the surface of the local sentiments. What has been striking to me so far is the difference in perception of our state of affairs. I am an optimist, I believe we have a strong, intelligent and vibrant people and they fundamentally are a good people. I understand that there are issues of corruption, and distribution of wealth and lack of reliable institutions. I believe the “middle class” (or what is left of it) and the “upper class” have a duty, an obligation to the poor of this nation. They are only well off due to the sacrifices of our masses. The solution to our nations problems do not lie in catering for every whim and requirement of the have’s but rather in serving the poor. Those of us who have been fortunate, by no achievement of our own except being born in the favorable circumstances, should understand that those born into unfavorable circumstances had just as little to do with it. For this favor, we have an obligation to others. Anyway, this is obviously just one aspect of Pakistan – the social issues, and there are multiple angles and facets that need to be understood, in order to provide a holistic resolution – but the poor the disenfranchised, the have’nots must be the focus of our nation – they are our engine and they are our means to future prosperity. If we alienate and disregard them, it will only be to the detriment of our own nation.

There are also a multitude of issues to do with Pakistan’s international policies and politics, which are unrepresentative of the people, but this again will only change by empowerment of the people who our leaders claim to represent. As such – by resolving a lot of the social aspects of or society we can have a mutil-layered impact on other issues (although these also need to be targeted and dealt with individually). Therefore I feel focusing on internal and social issues – which include primarily economics (distribution of wealth, cost of living, employment) coupled with the means to achieve this, through independent and reliable institutions – in particular the judiciary – we as a nation can build ourselves into a formidable international force representative of the people, and addresses the many frustrations of Pakistanis and Muslims as a whole. The change though must come from us, each of us.

I started by talking about perceptions, and I digressed, so to come back to that key point; I personally feel we have a lot to be optimistic about, we can change the state of affairs, we can be a respected nation, we can alter the state of mind of our people, we can make a difference, we have the tools – essentially because we are a principled people who do want what is best for our nation as a whole rather than just ourselves on an individual basis - but we face a lot of obstacles in the form of the status quo. This is my view – naïve I am told. The most common sentiment I have experienced is that of hopelessness, that of submission to the state of affairs, people are despondent, they have given up, they see no change, there is no motivation for change. Most people I speak to feel that things are just the way they are and will remain so because no one is really bothered. Those who are in positions of power or have strong financial standings do not see a need for change, why should they? They feel the masses are not worthy of anything better – their mentality is just such, they cannot be changed, let them be. Those who are in the “working class” feel the same apathy – there is nothing they can do, it is just the way things are, they just continue doing the best they can and not harbor any hopes because they are not really of concern to those who can make a change. Is this accurate? Am I delusional? Is what I think and the optimism I feel for our nation misplaced? Only one way to find out…..

So now what? All this optimism and criticism, I cannot just join the drawing room brigade for intermittent cathartic experiences. So I had to evaluate the possibilities, the options. So, let’s start with the neighborhood. So I started with other members of my neighborhood a basic group (I cringe to use the word “committee”) to resolve the local issues of security and cleanliness. We had some reasonable success and it seems to continue – but that is limited, and it only helps those who require little help – but it does prove that people are willing to contribute. So what else? One way – focus on social work, fund raise and do charitable work – but there are a lot of people much more seasoned already engaged in this activity, there seem to be no shortage of institutions, NGO’s and funding. Also, social activity alone doesn’t provide a long term and broadbase solution to the issues, it treats the symptoms but not the disease – but no doubt is an essential activity to engage in. My thoughts then went to the many discussions that people engage in, and often it is said, perhaps just in passing “one day I will get involved in politics”. I now started to give this flippant thought more serious consideration. I looked at the possibility, could I get involved? Well why not? I have certain skills which I could contribute with, I have a basic understanding of the issues, a willingness to learn and a genuine desire to be part of the inevitable change that our nation must go through – to save it from us. So why not? Well “it’s a dirty game”, “you cannot change the power bases”, “it’s a waste of time” are the most common responses, sans my immediate family and some like minded friends – who also seem to share my “misplaced” national optimism – are there others out there? Well, what have I got to loose? I’ll look foolish? Have looked foolish on many occasions where much less was at stake! If that was an issue I am sure many risks endured by man kind would never have been embarked upon. I don’t know how things work? Well that I can learn, and that is the only sure fire way of learning – experience. I will be unsuccessful – so what? It won’t make a difference? It will to me, regardless of the outcome. So I decided, this is the course that seemed to best align with my thoughts and objectives – but now the question moved onto how?

Well there were two obvious options. Start something, or join something. Starting something would be essential only if nothing existed that didn’t emulate the values and objectives that I held, and as such would have to be the second option in the absence of an alternative. So I evaluated the existing options. I listened to the various party leaders, read their manifestos, their objectives, their statements and their track record. There seemed to be an option – Imran Khan’s Tareek-i-insaaf party. In contrast the others it appeared to be lead by strong principles, a genuine desire to change the economic and social status quo, an objective of establishing strong institutions and regaining the sovereignty of our nation. All objectives which I shared. The party membership seemed to comprise of educated and like minded people, without an over riding personal interest. They seemed genuine and sincere, and did not mince their words. I liked that. It was rebellious – perhaps something that has always been attractive to me. No doubt in the “drawing room discussions” I heard many criticisms of the party – but nothing central to their objectives or approach – and everything to do with the fact that they had no realistic chance of winning. They were not a strong political party, they had only secured one seat, they did not have the vote bank – so? Is that the criteria for a good party? The fact that they may not have the potential for a sweeping victory? Do we only support people who win? Do you start supporting the rival team when your home team starts to loose? No. Granted Tareek-i-insaaf is the underdog – that personally, was more of an attraction than a detraction. I decided that this was an organization, within which I could see myself contributing, it’s message and objectives were in synch with my own personal thoughts. I also believe they are a credible party, no one doubts their sincerity or commitment, so the nay-sayers can only raise the issue of viability. The viability of the party will only be proven (or disproven) over time and through efforts, so to conclude that they were an unviable option would be premature. I therefore made a decision to engage further in this chosen course of action.